A macroeconomic update of the 4 "reserve currency" economies
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 at 01:04AM Greetings fellow inmates,
Last time, in A Macroeconomic Snapshot, we presented you with a brief visual snapshot of the four “reserve currency” economies – US, Euro, UK and Japan – in four key variables: GDP, Industrial Production, Unemployment and CPI. Originally, we focused our attention on those countries because they were the ones which featured most prominently in our broader discussions. This post is meant to be an update of how these variables have behaved since we last saw them. We spend the larger portion of our discussions on monetary or credit-related topics, but it is always useful on several fronts to take a step back and look at what is happening on an actual macroeconomic level.
Moreover, there has been plenty of talk of “green shoots” in the world economy. To be frank, we are not prone to keep our focus on miniscule time-scales of economic indicators nor trying to sift through the myriad of complex interlinked variables that might or might not lead each other, at times simultaneously. For that reason, we are not yet in a position to verify nor discount any notions of green shoots. We will say however, that we think this downturn has plenty more to go (hence making the probability of real green shoots now seem less likely) and that the media seems to have been desperately hanging on to any piece of news they could find. This is of course, our opinion but we do find it laughable to hear commentators in mass media wanting to hype the recovery by talking about the “improved” second derivative. What a joke. Regardless, as we said, we cannot yet disprove any notions of green shoots. As always, rather than try to forecast, we would rather look at the data itself.

GDP growth has worsened for three of the four countries. In the US, there was only a mild improvement that is, in reality, just as bad. It is interesting to note that the US has “technically” been in a recession since Dec 2007 according to the NBER yet it had two positive quarters. Keep that in mind in case Q2 09 or Q3 09 come up with a positive GDP print; it won’t mean the end of the recession. In Japan, GDP growth continues to get decimated; not only was the Q4 08 revised downward from -12% to -14%, but it actually worsened in Q1 09 to -15%. Really astounding numbers. Both the Euro Area and the UK saw very sharp acceleration of GDP shrinkage. Euro area declined by 9.6% while the UK contracted by close to 8%.

Every single country’s unemployment rate continued to worsen. In the US, unemployment hit a new multi-decade high at 8.9 in April. In March, the European unemployment rate climbed to 8.9%, from 8.5% in February. The UK’s unemployment went from 6.5% in Dec to 6.9% in February. Japan’s continued its skyrocketing upwards, in spite of its more structured and regulated labor markets, all the way to 4.8% in March, from 4.4% in February. One thing is for certain, there definitely are no green shoots in the employment sector.

Three out of the four countries saw a decline in their industrial production and the fourth one, Japan, saw an insignificant improvement. What is most notable of this indicator is the incredibly synchronicity with which they have plummeted. One can certainly say that these four countries productive machines were interlinked by some mechanism. Of course, it is easy to see now, that it is the credit market that holds them together; hence it makes sense that the GCC has prompted such a concerted and dramatic decline. This, perhaps more than anything else, shows very clearly and powerfully how the downturn in different credit markets affects the broader economies. Additionally, industrial production also gives an indication of how large the economy might be in the future, as many cut-back in production have been to reduce overall capacity, thus reducing the potential future capacity.

Finally, we see that all four countries saw a further decline in inflation. For those of you that might ask yourselves how this fits in with our prognostication of superinflation, we’ll remind you of a few things. For starters, we believe that superinflation will come about in the next 1-2 years through a strong decline in the value of the USD. We do not believe the driving cause will be an expansion of the broad monetary aggregates. As long as banks continue refusing to lend, the broad monetary aggregates will remain stagnant. Uncle Benny is not in control of M2, not even indirectly with his FedBS; the banks are fully in charge. For that reason, deflation will continue as long as banks refuse to lend and the dollar holds up well versus other currencies and commodities.
Well, in all frankness, after looking at the latest numbers we are not believers in any notion of “green shoots”, not by a long shot. The actual numbers still paint a worsening picture. Not only have most indicators worsened, but many have even accelerated (ie: second derivative) their decline. Even those indicators that improved, did so only insignificantly and remain at severely depressed levels . Of course, there are many other pieces of data one can look at, some of them believed to be “leading indicators”, but we chose to look only at the latest-available data of these indicators because we believe they represent the broadest picture of the economy. At least in this segment of the economic universe, as reporters, we must say there are no green shoots.
May your capital be safe and your investments prosperous!
MAAA
MAAA |
6 Comments |
Reader Comments (6)
Nice, thanks.
One detail -- it would make comparison easier if you kept the vertical scale identical in all four charts of a chart group.
J6P, thanks for the suggestion, I completely agree with you it would make comparisons easier. Unfortunately, due to personal time constraints, I did not download the data and make the charts myself. Instead I cropped the images of the charts from the NY FED directly.
"http://www.ny.frb.org/research/directors_charts/global_all.pdf"
Maybe for a future update I will take the time to look for all the data and present it in a more uniform way. Thanks for the suggestion though!
MAAA,
I am curious about your revised superinflation mechanism. Let me lay out what I think is going to happen and why I think it may actually be worse than superinflation. Sometime in the next one to three years foreign entities which have heretofore been willing to put there US currency into US financial assets including stock and treasuries will become more skeptical. Therefore they will start using their dollars to purchase tangible assets. I don't see much potential for a flight into other currencies because I don't see what currency a rational investor would flee to currently. This will by itself drive up inflation of goods as the demand for things rises vis-a-vis the demand for dollars. However it will also have the affect of reducing the flow of dollars into the treasury for purchases of treasury securities. This will force the US to print money in order to pay back interest on treasury securities or to raise taxes to draconian levels. Which do you think will happen? Printing money will further fuel dollar skepticism and add to inflation. That right there is a spiral of inflation. Does this agree with your thinking?
Disciplus,
I have been having an ongoing debate with MAAA (off blog) about the nature of the inflation that we are going to see. I tend to agree more with you (hyperinflation) as opposed to MAAA's superinflation (which he defines as 25% annualized inflation based on gov't statistics, ie CPI). The trend that I see is a retrenchment of investors and eventually financial institutions on credit derivatives and a shift to the most necessary goods. Prices will certainly rise precipitously, particularly for crude oil, natural gas, food commodities, water, and precious metal with exchange value (especially later on in the crisis precious metals may replace fiat currency entirely as they have in Zimbabwe). There will be too many factors in my mind to keep inflation within the bounds of superinflation. Oil depletion rates, droughts, geopolitical instability, the likelihood of another world war, or many intensified regional conflicts, and intense weather events, will combine to make all commodities spiral out of control. The only way I see to confine inflation to 25% annually is to keep shifting the basket of goods measured in the CPI. If we look at the next post on Shadow Government Statistics, inflation is already running around a realistic 8%. It is always important to remember that there is a discrepancy between what the government claims and what is actually happening; just as we should call banks out for peddling snake oil, so we should hold governments accountable for their disingenuous accounting.
Discipulus,
The mechanism you described is exactly what I believe is going to happen. As for the option between printing and taxes, I think it will be a combination of both. Monetary expansion has already been taking place at an enormous rate. Taxes will follow, if perhaps proportionally, not as fast as monetary expansion.
As for whether something worse actually awaits than superinflation, I wholeheartedly agree the possibility exists, and its not an insignificant one. I, unfortunately have to look at the official CPI, currently at -0.7%, for apples to apples. Would I secretly consider it too conservative? Yes, but the same is true with everything because I like to just look at data and definitions.
I also agree that its a spiral of inflation. And to be quite frank, I would not be surprised if there is a seemingly never-ending spiral that will simply be stopped by the institution of one world currency. The question then lies not in the potential size or speed of the spiral, but rather when they choose or are able to justify stopping it with one world currency. Is 25% enough? It seems doubtful, but you never know these days given the opiate addictive markets.